"Autoscopy"
is the phenomenon of seeing yourself from a position outside of your
body. Dr. Charles T. Tart,
the author of
Body Mind Spirit, is known for his experimental work in autoscopic
and near-death experiences. He is the professor of psychology at the
University of California at Davis. Charles Tart is internationally known
for his psychological work on the nature of consciousness
(particularly altered states of consciousness) and as one of the
founders of the field of transpersonal psychology. He served as an
instructor in psychiatry in the
School of
Medicine of the University of Virginia, and as a consultant on
government funded parapsychological research at the
Stanford Research Institute.
His website is filled
with gems concerning the out-of-body phenomenon.
The
following is an excerpt from an article by Dr. Tart which was
published in the
Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. In it,
Dr. Tart documents the out-of-body experience of a young woman who
was one of his research subjects. What makes this particular
out-of-body experience remarkable is that she was able to leave her
physical body and read a 5-digit number, which was at a significant
distance, and correctly give it to him upon return.
A young woman who frequently had spontaneous
out-of-body experiences was studied in a sleep laboratory for four
nights. She reported several partially out-of-body experiences and two
full ones.
During a conversation with a friend (whom
we shall call Miss Z) a couple of years ago, she reported that she
had spontaneous out-of-body experiences approximately two to four times
a week and that she would be interested in being studied in the
laboratory. As this afforded an unusual opportunity for research, I
studied her for four nights in a sleep laboratory in order to determine
what, if any, psychophysiological correlates of her out-of-body
experiences occurred. This paper will describe Miss Z and her
spontaneous experiences, and report on the psychophysiological studies
which were carried out.
She would wake once or twice during a
night's sleep. Each time she would find herself floating near the
ceiling, but otherwise seemingly wide awake. This condition would
last for a few seconds to half a minute. She frequently observed her
physical body lying on the bed. Then she would fall asleep again and
that was all there was to the experience. As far as she could
recall, these experiences had been occurring several times weekly
all of her life. As a child, she had not realized that there was
anything unusual about them. She assumed that everyone had such
experiences during sleep, and never thought to mention them to
anyone. After speaking about them to friends several times as a
teenager, however, she realized that they were looked upon as
"queer" experiences, and she stopped discussing them. At the time of
the experiment, she had never read anything about such experiences.
After initially hearing about her experiences, I asked her to
refrain from reading anything about them until our experiments were
completed, and she complied with this request. Note that Miss Z had
never made any attempts to control her out-of-body experiences, nor
did she attach any great significance to them. She definitely felt
that they were not dreams, but she was otherwise puzzled as to what
they were.
I was able to observe Miss Z in my sleep
laboratory for four non-consecutive nights, over a period of
approximately two months. The procedure was essentially the same on all
nights, and will be described here. Miss Z's electroencephalogram
(EEG) was recorded each night. The sleep laboratory consisted of two
rooms, each lined with acoustic tile for sound attenuation. A large
window was between the rooms for viewing, but in this experiment it was
covered with a Venetian blind in order that the subject's room could be
reasonably dark for sleeping. This blind allowed enough light to come
through so that the subject's room was dimly illuminated, but not enough
to disturb sleep. The polygraphs were located in the second room, and
the door was kept closed. An intercom system allowed hearing anything
the subject said. I monitored the recording equipment throughout the
night while the subject slept and kept notes of anything she said or
did. Occasionally I dozed during the night, beside the equipment, so
possible instances of sleep talking might have been missed. The subject
slept on a comfortable bed just below the observation window.
The leads from all electrodes were bound into
a common cable running off the top of her head, and terminating in an
electrode box on the head of the bed. This arrangement allowed her
enough slack wire so that she could turn over in bed and otherwise be
comfortable, but did not allow her to sit up more than two feet without
disconnecting the wires from the box, an event which would show up on
the recording equipment as a tremendous amount of sixty cycle artifact.
Thus her movements were well controlled. Immediately above the
observation window (about five and a half feet above the level of
the subject's head) was a small shelf (about ten inches by five
inches). Immediately above this shelf was a large clock, mounted on
the wall.
Each laboratory night, after the subject was
lying in bed, the physiological recordings were running satisfactorily,
and she was ready to go to sleep, I went into my office down the hall,
opened a table of random numbers at random, threw a coin onto the table
as a means of random entry into the page, and copied off the first five
digits immediately above where the coin landed.
These were copied with a black marking pen, in
figures approximately two inches high, onto a small piece of paper. Thus
they were quite discrete visually. This five-digit random number
constituted the parapsychological target for the evening. I then slipped
it into an opaque folder, entered the subject's room, and slipped the
piece of paper onto the shelf without at any time exposing it to the
subject. This now provided a target which would be clearly visible to
anyone whose eyes were located approximately six and a half feet off the
floor or higher, but was otherwise not visible to the subject. The
subject was instructed to sleep well, to try and have an out-of-body
experience, and if she did so to try to wake up immediately afterwards
and tell me about it, so I could note on the polygraph records when it
had occurred. She was also told that if she floated high enough to read
the five-digit number she should memorize it and wake up immediately
afterwards to tell me what it was. My conversation with Miss Z after I
had prepared the target was, of course, minimal and could not have given
her any clue as to the target number.
On reporting to the laboratory on the fourth
night, Miss Z seemed to be determined to have the right kind of
out-of-body experience. Although I had indicated complete satisfaction
with her performance so far, she was angry at herself because she had
not been able to float up and read the target number. Miss Z went
quickly to sleep, entering Stages 3 and 4 less than fifteen minutes
after going to bed. The night was uneventful for the most part - there
were several Stage 1 dream periods in the first two-thirds of the night,
as would be expected for any normal subject. After four and a half hours
of sleep, she had a Stage 1 dream period with REMs which lasted for half
an hour. The EEG was technically rather poor on this night, being
obscured with a great deal of sixty cycle artifact and requiring rather
heavy high frequency filtering to make it clear, so the EEG findings
should be taken with the realization that they are subject to more error
than usual. Miss Z's Stage 1 dream terminated with several minutes of
intermittent body movements and EEG artifact. Then (at 5:50 A.M.)
the occipital channel showed an enlarged, slow wave artifact, the REM
channel showed no REMs, and the record looked like a Stage I tracing;
however, I could not be sure due to the considerations mentioned above.
At 5:57 A.M. the slow wave artifact was lessened and the record looked
somewhat like Stage 1 with REMs, but I could not be sure whether this
was a waking or a Stage I record. This lasted until 6:04 A.M., at which
time Miss Z awoke and called out that the target number was 25132. This
was correct (with the digits in correct order), but I did not
say anything to her at this point; I merely indicated that I had written
the number down on the record. I then told her she could go back to
sleep, but twenty minutes later I awakened her so that she could get
ready to go to work. At this time, she described her experience as
follows:
"I woke up; it was stifling in the room. Awake
for about five minutes. I kept waking up and drifting off, having
floating feelings over and over. I needed to go higher because the
number was lying down. Between 5:50 and 6:00 A.M. that did it ... I
wanted to go read the number in the next room, but I couldn't leave the
room, open the door, or float through the door ... I couldn't turn off
the air conditioner!"
It should be mentioned that Miss Z had
expected me to prop the target number up against the wall on the shelf;
actually, I had laid it flat on the shelf, which she correctly
perceived. Also, I had put a second number on a shelf in the equipment
room, but she reported she could not get into this room to see the
number. Neither could she turn off the air conditioner, and she
complained - that although it had been stifling, it was too cold in the
room by that time. Since Miss Z's correctly calling a five-digit number
(P = 10^-5) [i.e., odds of 1 in 100,000] was the first strong
evidence that her out-of-body experiences contained a parapsychological
element, I inspected the laboratory carefully the next day to see if
there was any way in which this number could have been read by non
parapsychological means.
As a first
alternative to an explanation involving extrasensory perception, we
decided that "sophisticated" cheating by Miss Z was not impossible. She
might have concealed mirrors and reaching rods in her pajamas and used
these during the period when the EEG was difficult to classify (due
to movement artifacts)
to read the number. While this is possible, I personally doubt that it
occurred. The second alternative is that she might have seen the number
reflected in the surface of the case of the clock which was mounted on
the wall above it. This was the only reflecting surface in the room
placed in such a way that this might have been possible. Both Dr.
Hastings and I spent some time in the dimly lit room to dark-adapt our
eyes, and tried to read a number from the subject's position on the bed,
as reflected on the surface of the clock. As the room was dimly lit and
the surface of the clock was black plastic, we could not see anything of
the number. However, when we shone a flashlight directly on the number
(increasing its brightness by a factor somewhere between several hundred
and several thousand) we could just make out what the number was in the
much brighter reflection. Thus, although it seems unlikely, one could
argue that the number constituted a "subliminal" stimulus in its
reflection off the clock surface. Therefore, Miss Z's reading of the
target number cannot be considered as providing conclusive evidence for
a parapsychological effect. After calling out the number, Miss Z again
returned to sleep and spent approximately twenty minutes in a stage
where the EEG was again quite difficult to classify. It was a generally
low voltage, flattened record which looked rather like a poorly
developed Stage 1 record. However, there were no REMs to speak of, and
there was only a small amount of alphoid activity. Upon awaking, she
reported that she had had a number of floating sensations during this
time. [Journal of the
American Society for Psychical Research, 1968, vol. 62, no. 1,
pp. 3-27.]